The steel rope has already established a proven track record of over 100 years whereas belt drives are costly to maintain due to tracking breakages.

 

Ropes vs. Belts: A Detailed Comparison in Elevator Systems

In the realm of elevator technology, the mechanics behind lifting and lowering the elevator car are pivotal. Among the essential components are suspension ropes and belts—each with distinct characteristics in design, performance, and application. Although they serve a common goal, the variance in their structure and functionality makes them suited to different environments and operational requirements. Let’s delve into a comprehensive juxtaposition of suspension ropes and belts in elevators.

Structural Composition:

Ropes: Historically, the use of steel ropes in elevators has been ubiquitous. These ropes consist of numerous strands of steel wire meticulously intertwined, forming a robust and malleable mechanism capable of enduring immense loads. The resilience of steel ropes lies in their ability to maintain both strength and pliability, crucial for high-demand elevator systems.

Belts: On the other hand, belts found in modern elevators are typically constructed from materials such as rubber, polyurethane, or steel cords. Often designed as flat or toothed, these belts offer a lighter and more adaptable alternative to ropes. While their flexibility is superior, their durability may fall short in comparison to steel ropes, depending on the application.

Load-Bearing Capability:

Ropes: When it comes to high-rise elevator applications, steel ropes reign supreme due to their extraordinary tensile strength. They are capable of sustaining substantial loads over extended vertical distances, demonstrating minimal stretch or deformation under pressure.

Belts: Though belts are generally more limited in load capacity, their evolution in material science has allowed for more robust options. They are often more appropriate for short-range or lightweight elevator systems. However, advancements have led to the development of belts that can now handle heavier loads, albeit with certain constraints.

Flexibility and Design Adaptability:

Ropes: The inherent rigidity of steel ropes presents certain limitations, especially in elevators that require greater maneuverability and non-linear designs. Their stiffness can restrict the range of applications in more innovative architectural structures.

Belts: Contrastingly, belts shine in this area due to their superior flexibility. Their pliable nature permits more fluid operation, making them ideal for systems where design freedom and smooth motion are prioritized.

Maintenance Considerations:

Ropes: The longevity of steel ropes demands rigorous upkeep. Regular inspections are necessary to detect signs of wear, fraying, or corrosion, and periodic lubrication is required to maintain optimal performance. This routine care is essential to ensure both safety and durability over time.

Belts: Belts may offer the advantage of requiring less frequent maintenance. However, they are not maintenance-free. Inspections must still be conducted to assess for wear, potential stretching, or any damages that could compromise functionality. Their upkeep, while less intensive, still demands attention to detail.

Acoustic and Vibrational Performance:

Ropes: The operation of steel ropes tends to generate more noise and vibration, especially in older elevator models. This can result in a less comfortable ride experience, as the mechanical hum and tremors may become pronounced.

Belts: One of the key advantages of belts is their quieter operation. Their flat construction and flexible nature contribute to a smoother and less noisy ride, making them particularly appealing in environments where comfort and noise reduction are paramount. However, issues such as horizontal deviation and internal wire breakage can lead to vibration and performance degradation over time.

Energy Efficiency:

Ropes: Steel ropes, due to their weight and the friction generated during operation, can contribute to slightly higher energy consumption. The mechanical effort required to move these heavier components results in increased energy expenditure.

Belts: Lightweight materials used in belts can lead to more energy-efficient elevator systems. The reduced friction and lower mass result in less energy being required to move the elevator car, contributing to a more environmentally friendly option.

Safety Aspects:

Ropes: With a long-established history, steel ropes are a proven safe option for elevator systems. Rigorous testing and long-term performance records provide confidence in their reliability. Nonetheless, the need for consistent maintenance and safety checks remains crucial.

Belts: Modern belts are subject to stringent safety standards, and advancements in their construction have made them a dependable alternative. While they are relatively new compared to ropes, their development in terms of strength and safety has progressed significantly, making them a viable option in many contemporary elevator applications.

Cost Implications:

Ropes: The cost of steel ropes and their associated maintenance is generally considered reasonable within the industry. Their long lifespan and proven reliability make them a cost-effective choice in many scenarios.

Belts: In contrast, the initial cost of belts can be higher, and their maintenance can be more challenging. While they offer advantages in flexibility and noise reduction, the investment may not always justify the benefits depending on the specific use case.

Reliability and Lifespan:

Ropes: Steel ropes, with their century-long legacy in industrial applications, have a track record that speaks for itself. Their durability and reliability have been repeatedly demonstrated, making them the go-to choice for high-rise and high-load elevators. The technology surrounding steel ropes is mature and well-tested, providing peace of mind for both manufacturers and operators.

Belts: While the design life of steel-corded belts is often cited as being around 20 years, real-world applications, such as those in Japan, have shown that issues such as surface rubber aging and internal wear can arise much sooner, potentially within five years. This premature deterioration can lead to complications like wire breakage, making belts less reliable in long-term applications.

Conclusion:

The choice between suspension ropes and belts for elevator systems is far from straightforward and depends heavily on a variety of factors, including load capacity, building height, flexibility needs, maintenance protocols, noise control, and safety regulations. Steel ropes, with their tried-and-tested history, offer unparalleled reliability for high-demand environments, while belts provide innovation in terms of flexibility and noise reduction, albeit with certain limitations in load capacity and long-term durability. Each option has its merits and drawbacks, and the decision should be tailored to the specific requirements of the elevator installation.

To read related articles, click here.